The Trump marketing campaign’s lawsuit looking for to dam Pennsylvania from certifying its election result’s based mostly on “absurd” logic contradicted by the information in its personal grievance, teams representing voters instructed a federal decide.
President Donald Trump, who alleges an enormous Democratic conspiracy in his refusal to concede defeat within the Nov. three election, has “utterly failed” to supply proof of such a fraud whereas looking for to scrap tens of hundreds of votes over technical disputes associated to mail-in ballots, the teams mentioned in a submitting Friday night.
The marketing campaign seeks “to justify mass disenfranchisement with an incoherent conspiracy theory,” the teams, together with the Pennsylvania chapters of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People and the League of Women Voters, mentioned within the submitting in Williamsport.
“We did not establish a representative democracy to ask courts to ‘declare’ who wins our elections,” the teams mentioned.
US District Judge Matthew Brann, an Obama appointee, is concurrently weighing the Trump marketing campaign’s amended request for an injunction and Pennsylvania’s movement to dismiss the swimsuit.
The marketing campaign seeks to audit 1.5 million ballots in Democratic-leaning counties and topic them to a “statistical analysis” to find out what number of could also be “illegal,” who the ballots have been forged for, and supply an estimate on many must be thrown out.
Trump Challenge to Election Results Hits Hardest at Black Voters
The marketing campaign claims that not less than 70,000 ballots have been in all probability counted illegally in Pennsylvania as a result of voters have been allowed to repair, or “cure,” minor errors in Democratic-leaning counties earlier than Election Day, whereas some Republican-led counties rejected such ballots.
The voter teams mentioned of their submitting that election employees’ intensive documentation of voters who have been allowed to “cure” errors contradicts the swimsuit’s declare a few conspiracy. Workers additionally went to nice lengths to assist voters forged accomplished ballots, they mentioned, contradicting the declare that officers have been secretly counting faulty ones.
“Plaintiffs do not explain why, if these counties were conspiring to count defective ballots, they went out of their way to help voters fix mistakes to cast non-defective ballots,” the teams mentioned. And whereas the marketing campaign claims that the counties’ curing course of was meant “to favor Biden,” related protocols have been utilized in a number of counties the place voters favored Trump by vast margins, in accordance with the submitting.
Those Republican-leaning counties aren’t named within the swimsuit.
The teams’ submitting included examples of particular person voters whose ballots could be rejected over seemingly irrational deficiencies if the marketing campaign succeeds, together with 73-year-old Natalie Price of Montgomery County, northwest of Philadelphia.
“A day or two before the election, Ms. Price was notified that her ballot had been rejected because she did not write her name and address on the ballot declaration, which seemed unnecessary because it was pre-printed on the envelope,” in accordance with the submitting. Price traveled to a polling place and “added this duplicative information to her ballot.”
For that, the submitting says, the Trump marketing campaign would deem her vote “illegal.”
Michigan Lawmakers Who Met Trump Stand by Election Outcome
Rejecting mail-in ballots from licensed registered voters as a result of they got an opportunity to repair minor errors earlier than Election Day could be a violation of the suitable to vote, they mentioned. No proof has been introduced that ballots have been forged by unregistered or invalid voters, they mentioned.
“While plaintiffs’ allegations and claims continue to twist and turn, in search of a legal theory that could justify this lawsuit, their ultimate goal has remained the same: to disenfranchise” tens of millions of voters “in an effort to overturn an unfavorable election result,” the mentioned.